Posts Tagged ‘Design’

Jaguar 13 + 75

Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

A few years ago we had the pleasure of meeting legendary Jaguar devel­opment engineer Norman Dewis. This is the man responsible for the shakedown of many of the most incredible British cars ever made — and some of the out and out most beautiful and successful production cars and racers ever to grace a piece of tarmac.

You can read about our encounter with Norman and the then new Jaguar XF in issue 5 of our print mag here.

For some reason, we never saw this beautiful little Dunhill-​​produced video last year at the time of the Jaguar XC75’s release. Take a look. it gives a really great insight into the process of Jaguar design, and Norman Dewis and Ian Callum’s collab­or­ation in that process.

What makes car designs that last and become classics is that sort of continuity between form, function, belief and ethos.

We reckon Jaguar’s renais­sance of late owes a lot to this. Enjoy and celebrate something that makes us proud to be British!

Cue Elgar.

Bizzarini Manta

Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

We’re suckers for defunct automotive brands. And one of the most spectacular and exotic of the passed car-​​makes of recent times is Bizzarrini.

The company was Founded by Giotto Bizzarrini a former engineer for Alfa Romeo, Ferrari and Iso. Until the company closed in 1969 they built a number of inter­esting concepts and sports cars — their rarity of course including the aesthetic as well as financial value. Giotto’s cars were usually of the brutally audacious — think of the muscular super-​​coupés that were Iso Grifo — and he was partly responsible of course for the 250 GTO Breadvan.

The Manta, made from bits and pieces made by the soon-​​to-​​be-​​defunct Bizzarini company, was Giorgetto Giugiaro’s first independ­ently built car. He used it to launch Ital Design in the car show at Turin in 1968.

Apart from its period-​​correct wedge design, the most striking thing about this creation is the three-​​up interior layout, which, we suppose, was borrowed from that Ferrari 365 prototype of 1965. This setup was of course revived very success­fully later on with the McLaren F1.

This chassis was a tubular steel Bizzarini design built especially for the rigours of Le Mans and the motor was a torquey Ford ‘small black’ V8.

After the Turin show the car was put on a World Tour that included the 1969 Los Angeles Auto Expo. It wasn’t exactly well-​​received stateside, and was perhaps correctly perceived as a bit of typical spaced-​​out European indul­gence. According to Road and Track magazine it was “yet another 200-​​mph suppos­itory in bright orange…”

Apparently the car was purchased in 2003 from a Texan collector and then restored for two years, where it got this dashing turqoise paintjob — before winning a category prize at pebble beach in 2005.

The Manta is one of those rare crystal­lisa­tions of automotive brilliance — and Bizzarini a brand that was all about passion.

Porsche 911 Overhang Hangover

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

When we saw the new 911 last week, we were immedi­ately struck by the size of the overhang. We thought it made the car look ugly.

It’s predictable that when a new version of the totemic Porsche comes along, it puts the cat among the pigeons. You get used to seeing so many of the current edition at any one time, it’s always going to be an aesthetic jar when a new version comes along. Human nature is draw to the familiar and rejects instinct­ively anything that disturbs that comforting field.

The 911 with its big flat six buried in the rear overhang itself ever since its conception at the start of the sixties, has always been a rare excep­tions —  a sports car that works with a lot of rear overhang.

Balance, handling, performance and aesthetic consid­er­a­tions all go into the mix when designers make decisions about something so funda­mental to a car’s very ethos as how much steel extends out beyond the wheelbase.

In cars with the engine in the front, a rear overhang of course helps with storage — and a bit of for’ard overhang will balance this out aesthet­ically and also accom­modate a nice big engine. You see this a lot on family wagons and tourers, partic­u­larly your BMW five and seven series cars and the genres they dominate.

When you stick the engine in the rear as in the 911, you situate the mass of the engine to the aft of the the wheelbase, which contributes to that delicious back-​​happiness as well as providing a nice rear crumple zone to protect in the case of a collision.

So, while your sports car designer has usually sought to reduce overhang, we can think of at least two sporty cars with loads of it. Think of the E-​​Type, with an acreage of front and rear overhang (beautiful thought it is) and the love-​​it-​​or-​​hate-​​it Saab Sonnet (below) which had a spectacular amount of front overhang but hardly any at the rear. We’ve never driven a Sonnet, so we wouldn’t know, but we imagine it must have suffered from terrible understeer…

And predictably, now we’ve had a few days to mull over these things, we’re kind of digging the new 911’s long, low, sleek lines. And you can bet it’s going to be a gem to drive.

Abarth/Bertone Collaborations

Thursday, July 21st, 2011

With people like Marcello Gandini and Giugiaro manning the studios, Bertone was arguably the defin­itive coach­builder in that incredibly creative period between 1965 – 75.

While the great era of futurist Supercars like the Miura and the Countach owes everything to the inner workings of Bertone at that time, the company made some signi­ficant innov­a­tions as far back as the early 1950s.

Collaborations with Abarth are some of the most interesting.

One look at the Abarth 1500 Biposto (top), which was penned by Franco Scaglione while a junior designer at Bertone, can confirm its influence on the BAT concepts for Alfa — and the subsequent swathe of futurist Americana that emanated from Detroit for the rest of the decade.

But you can see from the outrageous aero slickness in the Fiat 500 — based record-​​attempt car that there was more to the house of Bertone than scalloped wheel arches, chrome fins and nonfunc­tional flourishes.

And what about the seldom seen 750 (above) from 1956? How about this for a sort of Batman-​​like take on the Sunbeam Alpine?

America's Dreamcars...

Thursday, June 16th, 2011

Ok, ok. We concede. America owned the car in the 1950s. Us Europeans made some good motors, and we set ourselves up well for the ‘60s with the launch of the Mini in ’59. But we couldn’t get close to America in the ‘50s; not on numbers, not on power, and most clearly of all, not for its extraordinary, unres­trained, never-​​to-​​be-​​repeated exuberance of design.

We think of America as being more in love with the car in the ‘50s than ever before or since, but when you look at the cars it made – and more specifically its concept cars – you’d think it was bored of the car already. This was the decade of jetliners and super­sonic flight, of Sputnik and the start of the space race. Americans didn’t want cars that looked like they could go fast: they wanted cars that looked like they could fly. Tailfins! Yes! Now make them bigger! Plexiglas bubble canopies! Fuselage bodies! Turbines for engines! Who cares how hot that exhaust gas is! I want a car I can stand on its damn backside and beat the Russians to the Moon!

A little economic background. Continental Europe, plainly, was rent by the war; those car factories that survived had been turned over to munition and military vehicle production and needed turning back. Britain started rather better; the first post-​​war Motor Show of 1948 was rare flash of optimism amidst the grey post-​​war austerity, and saw the debut of the Jaguar XK120 (sex) and the Morris Minor (profit). Britain made around half a million cars in 1950, less than ten per cent of America’s output. But it exported three-​​quarters of them; globally, more than half of all cars exported from their home market came from the UK that year.

And that’s because America just didn’t have the time to bother with small, weird, poor markets overseas. Its economy rebounded much faster than Europe’s after the war and its car industry had a tough time keeping up; it too had to retool after the war and labour disputes limited capacity. Sales volumes didn’t really explode in the ‘50s; they started the decade around five million and finished around seven.

But everything else went nuts, partic­u­larly the styling. The Buick Y-​​Job of 1938 is generally held to be the first concept car, but such indul­gence was quickly halted by the war. The Korean War caused a little restraint too, but by ’53 all bets were off, and America’s appetite for excess, speed, flight and space, and its ability to afford it, produced some of the maddest vehicles ever made.

Political correctness was of little importance. The ’56 Cadillac Maharani concept, named after the wife of a maharaja, really did come with everything including the kitchen sink, so a dutiful wife could more completely cater for her husband and family on a picnic. The 1951 Kaiser Safari was trimmed with zebra and lion skins.

Most concept cars – or ‘dreams cars’, as they were more often referred to – showcased some new technology or design innov­ation, but you wonder if the engineers at GM and Ford and Chrysler honestly believed they could bring some of them to production, or whether they were conceived purely as crowd-​​pleasers. Way out on the unlikely-​​to-​​be-​​seen-​​in-​​a-​​showroom end of the spectrum were some of the Ford concepts, like the two-​​wheeled Gyron (above) which used a gyroscope to stabilize it and had little legs that emerged as its slowed to prop it up at rest. Or the Ford Nucleon (below), powered by a rear-​​mounted nuclear reactor which only needed refuelling (“yeah, I’ll have a Ginsters, twenty Bensons and kilogram of uranium, please”) every five thousand miles.

The three-​​car Firebird series of concepts created by legendary GM design chief Harley Earl in ’53, ’56 and ’59 could be dismissed the same way. Each was powered by an actual gas turbine (the Nucleon, you won’t be surprised to learn, didn’t have an actual nuclear reactor) which GM took seriously enough as a future means of propulsion to build, run, and test. With exhaust gases at nearly 700 degrees centi­grade it was probably soon obvious that a big, lazy V8 was still the better solution.

But the Firebirds were signi­ficant for two reasons. First, they set the tone for the jet-​​and-​​rocket aesthetic that dominated American car design in the fifties. The first one just looked like a jet fighter, with a fuselage body, bubble canopy and a huge single rear tailfin. Oh, those tailfins: they were the fifties and they were sold via artwork like that created by the great Art Fitzpatrick. They first appeared in ’48, got bigger every year until they reached their literal peak with the genuinely iconic foot-​​high fins on the back of the ’59 Cadillac Eldorado. Then they got smaller every year from 1960, until they disap­peared around 1965. But they took off with the Firebirds.

And second, the Firebirds first posited a whole bunch of techno­logies we still get excited about today; light­weight composite bodies, keyless entry, car ‘platooning’ and crash avoidance, and air brakes, just like the one on the new McLaren MP4-​​12C.

So not only did they look like the future, they actually were. More import­antly to 1950s Americans, they were great enter­tainment, and GM bust its best concepts out of the straight-​​jacket of the motor show and put them on the road in the Futurama shows, which toured the country from 1949 to ’61, displaing the cars alongside other space-​​age advances like microwaves and video­phones and pulling in over ten million visitors.

Europe just didn’t have anything to compare. The concept car wasn’t an entirely alien concept – Alfa and Bertone produced the mad BAT series, for Berlinetta Aerodinamica Tecnica, between ’53 and ’55. And when the Italian carmakers and design houses started doing concepts for every big motor show from the late sixties, they made some of the most memorable and outrageous automotive sculpture ever seen.

But the outrageous was irrel­evant to the European motoring culture in the 50s. Small, affordable, practical and smart was what mattered if we wanted to get back on four wheels. Forget the Firebird concepts — you could have put a late ‘50s American production car like that ’59 Eldorado onto a European motor show stand and it would have looked like it had arrived from another planet. Which would have been just what its designer had intended, and his audience had wanted.

The Joy of Graph #1

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011

We’re unashamed fetishists of automotive design and spend an unhealthy time online and at various car events sifting through the voluminous back catalogue of a century of car culture. Our mission, dear reader, is to dig out some choice pieces car and bike-​​related graphic art for your enjoyment.

Now we could be accused of retro-​​fetishism, but hasn’t digital design lessened the impact of that lovely handwrought feel of pre-​​nineties car design?

Design ateliers in the automotive industry, which used to reek of woodbine and turps and were populated by talented chaps in collar-​​and-​​tie, have been trans­formed into feintly humming temples to the genius of Steve Jobs — where nary a long lunch can be tolerated.

Sure, digital design has made the graphic medium easily accessible and much more convenient — and many of the highest examples of car pennery we’ll be presenting to you have been in fact created on a computer — but it doesn’t lessen the tactile, aesthet­ically appealing feel of design materials that existed before the ubiquity of the pixel.

Stay tuned for more in the coming weeks.

Jaguar Design at Clerkenwell

Tuesday, June 7th, 2011

If you were lucky enough to find yourself at Clerkenwell Design Week recently, you would have been treated to a delicious display of the celeb­rated new design ethos of Jaguar. The centrepiece of the show was the one-​​off C-​​X75 concept car — and the show itself documented the process from the first sketch to production through a bespoke art install­ation designed and produced by the Jaguar design team.

We want to explain to people the art of creating a car,” Hugo Nightingale, Senior Designer at Jaguar told press. “In some companies car design is a technical, cold process. At Jaguar it is about emotion, artistry and craftsmanship.”

Clerkenwell Design Week is the perfect envir­onment for us to present the C-​​X75 to the design world”… he continued… “it gave us the oppor­tunity to explain how its existence was founded on a desire to continue Jaguar’s design philo­sophy of flowing lines, purity of form and bespoke luxury for years to come.”

The install­ation revealed insights into the car design process, the journey including sketchwork, material elements and full-​​size clay models.

For Jaguar the C-​​X75 is the study that will inform all of the brand’s forth­coming products — which will distill this urge to create beautiful cars that are usable and marketable too.

Sounds like a plan to us.

Jag’s talis­manic design director Ian Callum said “The C-​​X75 is everything a Jaguar should be. It possesses remarkable poise and grace yet at the same time has the excitement and potency of a true supercar. You could argue this is as close to a pure art form as a concept car can get.”

The current lineup of Jags has breathed a whole new waft of energy into the peren­nially attractive Jaguar brand — and this new design ethos is a major element in the recent turnaround in the fortunes of the Jaguar Land Rover group’s fortunes.