Posts Tagged ‘Electric car’

Eleven Ice-Cold Scandinavian Cars...

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Top 11 Scandinavian cars

Zenvo ST1

Where do you start with the Zenvo ST1? With the fact this it is Denmark’s first and only supercar? With its extreme, angular, ground-​​breaking looks? With its equally extreme power and torque figures, both of which are in four figures? With the fact that its top speed has to be electron­ically limited to 233mph, at which speed it will cross its home country in just 18 minutes? Whichever way you look at it, the ST1 is a staggering new sportscar from a brand — and indeed a country – with no automotive heritage. Zenvo’s Nordic logo incor­porates a shield with the name at the top and a stylized drawing of Thor’s hammer, intended to represent “massive cars with plenty of strength”. Just 15 units are scheduled for production.

Fisker Karma

Although its HQ is officially in LA, we think the Fisker Karma deserves inclusion here. The firm’s founder and chief designer Henrik Fisker is Danish; previous credits include most of the current Aston Martin range, so he has form. His radical, gorgeous £80,000, 400bhp plug-​​in hybrid Karma will be built by Valmet in Finland; it can cover 50 miles on emissions-​​free electric power and give an average of 100mpg.

Volvo XC90

A relat­ively rare example of a Swedish car company producing an iconic car while under foreign ownership. On its launch in 2003 the XC90 was so popular that there were waiting lists a year long in the UK – and this for a Volvo, remember, not some new Ferrari. Early versions had a lethargic diesel engine-​​gearbox combin­ation but apart from this, the firm’s first SUV was pretty much flawless in concept and execution. The seven-​​seat cabin layout is its strongest suit, with a usable third row that folds fully flat, a genius integ­rated child-​​seat that slides forward to within reaching distance of the fronts, and a front cabin almost without equal for comfort and ergonomics.

Koenigsegg CCR

Sweden makes dull, safe, dependable cars. Italy does the outrageous supercars with unpro­nounceable names, right? Not entirely. In 1994 Sweden added a third automaker to Volvo and Saab, and it makes rather different cars. In 2005, a Koenigsegg CCR broke the McLaren F1’s long-​​standing record as the world’s fastest production car at a test at the Nardo high speed circuit deep in southern Italy; home territory for its exotic rivals. Two other cars have since bested it, but Sweden’s only sports car maker had finally arrived. Founder Christian von Koenigsegg founded his firm at the age of 22. Owning a supercar by that age would be impressive; starting your own supercar maker and creating a new model that bears your name seems barely credible. He sketched the original design and two years later he had a prototype. His first client took delivery of his car at the Geneva Auto Show in 2002. Top Gear famously binned one at its test track and criti­cized the aero package, but your corres­pondent did 214mph in one and found it pretty composed.

Porsche Boxster

Eh? What’s more German than a Porsche? But since 1997, over 220,000 Boxsters and Caymans have been built for Porsche by Finnish coach­builder Valmet at its near-​​unpronounceable factory in Uusikaupunki, Finland. It is the only company or factory licenced to build Porsches outside Germany, and a sign of real confidence from a company obsessed with build quality. Other than a letter on the VIN plate, you just can’t tell the difference between a Finnish and a German-​​made Boxster or Cayman.

Volvo Venus Bilo

The first concept car is generally thought to be the sensa­tional Buick Y-​​job of 1938, created by Harley Earl, head of General Motor’s famous ‘Art and Colour’ section. But Volvo would disagree with that claim. In 1933 it built the one-​​off Venus Bilo, intended, like the Y-​​job, to test public reaction to futur­istic, stream­lined styling. The production car it spawned, the radical-​​looking 1935 PV36 wasn’t a great success, but it didn’t put Volvo off making mad concepts.

Saab 900

If space constraints mean we could only include one ‘standard’ Saab, I guess it would have to be the 900 Classic, though plenty of Saab anoraks will argue. But this car lasted 15 years and united all the attributes that we now think make a Saab a Saab, from the wraparound, helmet-​​visor screen to turbocharged engines. There was a lot that was odd about it, like the combin­ation of front-​​wheel drive and longit­udinal engine that was so space-​​inefficient you could fit a couple of suitcases in lengthwise between the motor and the wings. But much was brilliant too, like comfort, space, ride, torque, quality and reliab­ility. 900 Classics are rightly going up in value.

Saab 96

Oh, okay, one more Saab. You can’t really leave out the 96, which although it didn’t sell in such big numbers as the 900 has a madder and more distinctive and recog­nizable shape, and which opened up Saab’s most important export markets in its 20-​​year production run. Erik Carlsson’s three RAC and two Monte Carlo rally victories in the early sixties in the 96 had the same effect on Saab’s image and acceptance as Mini’s exploits in the Monte.

Volvo 240

If the 900 is the defin­itive Saab, then the 240 is defin­itely the defin­itive Volvo, with almost 3 million made over nearly 20 years from 1973. Unlike the Saab, its super-​​square looks owe nothing to aerody­namics but everything to Volvo’s seminal early ‘70s Experimental Safety Car concept. It unques­tionably saved lives, but the hearse-​​like styling looked like it was better suited to carrying those already deceased. But if Sweden had a national car, this would be it. British designer Peter Horbury, asked to style the later Volvo V70 estate, said it was ‘like being handed the Swedish crown jewels’.

Volvo P1800

Proof that the Swedes can do cool as well as cold when they try. The P1800 was designed by a Swede working for Italian styling house Frua, and its launch at the ’61 Geneva motor show was overshadowed by Jaguar’s lissome E-​​Type with its claimed 150mph top speed. But the P1800 won the public’s attention back by providing Simon Templar’s wheels in the original run of The Saint, making it one of the iconic shapes of the sixties.

Think City

Nineteen years of devel­oping electric cars, including a flirtation with Ford which cost the bigger firm $150m might finally be about to pay off. Think is putting its 60mph electric city car with a 100-​​mile range on sale in its native Norway, Austria and Switzerland, is eying other markets and planning to start production in the US too. Buyers are desperate for usable electric cars, govern­ments are keen to encourage them, and the falling cost of batteries will soon make them more affordable; expect Think to capitalize.

Global Apocalypse!

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

Reason One: It’s all going to be okay…

The magnificently-​​named former OPEC leader Sheikh Yamani pointed out to his colleagues decades ago that the stone age didn’t end for lack of stone: his point was that mankind wouldn’t wait until we ran out of oil to find something better. And at the risk of sounding like an unrecon­structed Thatcherite there’s a good chance the free market will sort this one out. Finding viable altern­atives to fossil fuels isn’t just good for the envir­onment: because we need to replace conven­tional cars and their infra­structure, the companies that crack this could end up as big as Toyota and BP combined. That’s quite some motivation.

This bloke says it's going to be alright. feel better?

Reason two: There are some big brains on the case…

The major car companies have tasked their smartest engineers with saving their bacon. More promisingly, a lot of the guys who made billions during the technology and dot-​​com booms are investing in ‘clean-​​tech’ firms, including electric car companies. People like 38 year-​​old Elon Musk, who made two dot-​​com fortunes by his early thirties and now, in addition to designing the rockets built by his own space-​​exploration firm, designs and builds electric cars at Tesla, where he is CEO and the largest shareholder.

Reason three: The Tesla Roadster

Speaking of Musk, his Tesla Roadster alone is a reason to be cheerful about the future, and proof that we won’t be condemned to driving glorified electric golf-​​carts. The Roadster is absurdly, shock­ingly fast; so much so that it’s hard not to drive it like a complete arse, booting it every time a gap opens in the traffic just to feel that bizarre silent-​​slingshot sensation again.

Silent running, zero emissions and instant torque. The Tesla makes us feel optimistic

The sensation of accel­er­ation is increased by a factor of three; firstly by the fact that an electric motor makes all of its torque available instantly. Second, there’s that single-​​speed trans­mission, which makes the accel­er­ation seamless and relentless. And lastly there’s the lack of noise. The worry most frequently expressed by car nuts over electric propulsion is the lack of an engine note, but you soon realize that silence is one of this car’s greatest assets, making the super­natural speed seem even weirder.

Reason four: smugness

Yes, the Tesla Roadster is eye-​​wateringly expensive at around £100,000 depending on spec. But you can’t put a value on the intense sense of smugness that comes from knowing that you’re driving the first electric supercar, that unlike every other car around it, its performance comes with no envir­on­mental penalty, and that the investment you’ve made will accel­erate electric cars that everyone can afford. Frankly, the smugness alone justifies the price tag.

Reason five: they will get cheaper

The big mistake the big carmakers made with electric cars the last time around was to try to make them mass-​​market from day one. Doh. Tech doesn’t work that way, as guys like Elon Musk know all too well. Think back to the early days of television or mobile phones; they were expensive and frankly a bit crap, but bought by eager early-​​adopters desperate for the latest thing and uncon­cerned by price. Their money funded the devel­opment and economies of scale that gave us TVs and mobiles we could all afford. Electric cars are going the same way, so don’t be resentful at how much the Tesla costs.

Reason six: the Opel Ampera

Also known as the Chevy Volt or the Vauxhall Ampera, depending on where you buy it, this plug-​​in hybrid gives a range of at least 25 miles on electric power alone. Sounds pathetic, but it’s enough for the daily needs of around 80 per cent of drivers. By keeping the battery size down you keep the cost down too, and if you need to drive further there’s a petrol engine, so you can drive it like a ‘normal’ car. Smart? The big carmakers all seem to think so; expect plug-​​ins from Toyota, BMW and just about everyone else before long.

Electric powered Ampera: tons of oil still used in its manufacture

Reason seven: it works

I just got back from a few days driving a Tesla Roadster around LA. At first I was mildly terrified at the idea of running out of charge in the middle of gangland in a £100,000 bright orange sports car. It’s called ‘range anxiety’, and electric car makers know it’s one of the most important hurdles they have to overcome. But by oppor­tun­ist­ically topping up wherever I stopped, I don’t think the batteries ever got below half-​​charge. It was easy, and as more electric cars appear on the roads, charge points will be even easier to find; electricity isn’t exactly in short supply.

Reason eight: never having to stop for gas again

So petrol prices are at an all-​​time high again. Drive an electric car and you just won’t care; you’ll cruise silently past the BP and Shell signs, oblivious to the ever-​​larger numbers they display, the whole garish edifice looking as outdated and redundant as the stone horse-​​watering troughs you still occasionally see by the side of the road. And why are we so attached to filling up with petrol anyway? It’s a stagger­ingly miserable exper­ience: cold, greasy forecourts, stinky bogs, terrible food and attendants so bored they just can’t be bothered to make eye contact with their customers any more. That, or waking up to a fully-​​charged electric car every morning? Umm…

Reason nine: some things won’t change

Think green cars will liberate us from our dangerous dependence on natural resources buried deep under­ground in polit­ically unstable or unfriendly states? Think again. As we become increas­ingly dependent on lithium-​​ion batteries – not just for mobiles and laptops but for car power too – demand for lithium will spike. Half of the world’s lithium is buried under the Salar de Ayuni salt-​​flats in Bolivia. Bolivia’s President is the hard-​​line socialist Evo Morales, and he’s not in any rush to start mining it; not until the West is good and desperate…

Reason ten: there’s always an alternative

Of course, if we’re wrong and the oil runs out before we have any viable new car-​​propulsion tech in place, there’s another option that’s free to run, never needs refuelling, is carbon-​​neutral, gets you fit, and correctly configured can carry you, your kids and your shopping. It’s called the bicycle. Buy now, while stocks last.

Tell me again: who killed the electric car?

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

gm-ev2

The contro­versy surrounding the ill-​​fated EV-​​1, the electric car that General Motors launched with much fanfare in 1996, seems a little long-​​in-​​the-​​tooth for these days of envir­on­mental and economic apoca­lypse. But isn’t it worth re-​​addressing the conspiracy theories? Could it be that ‘big oil’ bolstered by a boost­erist economic climate and a Republican admin­is­tration sunk to the hindquarters in the corporate board­rooms of America, really scuppered a product that could have been the true herald of a carbon neutral America? Could the original EV-​​1 have been as good as Tom Hanks (the universal voice of reason for the American liberal) said it was? Surely there will be boffins and CEOs in Detroit as I write frantically drawing up plans for a new depression-​​busting electric car that will drag America and its auto industry from the brink of economic collapse. Surely the time is right for a mass-​​market electric vehicle that will appeal to real drivers and lovers of the automobile as fetish object. The political and economic reality of things, as these two excerpts help us under­stand, is incredibly complicated.

According to Californian academic David Spurling, in around fifteen years it is expected that there will be two billion vehicles driving around the planet. If even 60 percent of these vehicles are as polluting as the average contem­porary vehicle, it means by most accepted estimates, our current emissions targets will be laughably out of line – and climate change may have gone way over tipping point – with disastrous consequences. The technology to build exciting, desirable non-​​pollutant cars has been there for a long time. The real problem lies in rallying the investment in the infra­structure needed to facil­itate the widespread marketing, sales and distri­bution of electric vehicles, plug-​​in electric hybrids, fuel-​​cell driven vehicles and other emissions free motors. It perhaps then shouldn’t be surprising that the EV-​​1 might have been scuppered by an industry savvy enough to know that the world wasn’t ready for such a revolu­tionary product. The question is; where do we go from here? And how does Barack Obama’s ‘bail out’ and the ‘green stimulus’ effect the wider world? Because of the two billion cars that are expected to be clogging up the world’s highways by 2020, only a fraction of them will be driven by Americans.