Posts Tagged ‘Fiat’

Homage to the Fiat X1/9

Monday, August 15th, 2011

The Fiat X1/​9 was, like the Lancia Monte Carlo, one of those supremely aspir­a­tional mini supercars of the eighties that made anyone of a certain age believe they could achieve.

The Bertone–penned two seater had the whiff of the exotic — mid mounted engine, rear wheel drive, it was light and it handled.

When we think of the car we always associate it with the decade that bought Margaret Thatcher and shoulder pads, but by the time that decade began it had already been available for eight years.

Such was the forward thinking nature of the Bertone design — with targa top and an acreage of period correct black plastic — it’s hardly surprising that come the eighties it was actually manufac­tured by the Carrozzeria itself.

Our fave manifest­ation is the Dallara racing version (below), that came with hugely flared arches and the rear wing.
And, of course, that Lovely brown paint job.

Dark Horse

Friday, July 15th, 2011

In a bit of Friday full moon serendipity, we stumbled upon this rather inter­esting little Danish film that features a rather pretty little Fiat 600.

While it was of course the car that caught the eye, the poster is a nice little bit of car culture in itself.

Not being Danish speakers, we’re relying on the graphic prettiness of the poster, the car and the actress to suggest that you should check it out for yourself.

We’re not sure why the 600 seems to be a little less of a presence in the Fiat back catalogue.

Who knows — perhaps they will eventually extend the super successful new 500 brand into the innov­ative Multipla format.

Kind of Fiat does Mini brand extension.

Funnily enough, the lead actor looks to me to be the Swedish equivalent of Belstaff poster boy Ewan McGregor.

Concept Corner #2

Thursday, July 14th, 2011

We wondered for a while what this thing actually was.

But now, as you can see this exemplar of early seventies wedginess is clearly identified as an Abarth-​​Pinifarina collab­or­ation from 1970 — which appar­ently resides in Japan (see image below).

This car is one of those rarities around which there seems to be a shroud of mystery. We’re not even sure the Gallery Abarth, which, appar­ently, houses it, actually exists.

Can’t find out the who, how, what and why of this car — so if anyone can fill in the details out there, please drop a comment or two.

Rare as Hen's Teeth #4

Tuesday, May 10th, 2011

Pio Manzini (Manzu to his friends) was Italian to his bones, part of a venerable and artistic Milanese family — but decided to persue his studies at the Hochschule in Germany’s Ulm. This technically-​​focussed university was perfect for his interests in material science and bending metal into pretty shapes.

The Healey 3000 concept for Pininfarina was his disser­tation project: and very inter­esting it was too. After gradu­ating in 1965 he was snapped up by NSU Motorworks — where he worked on various design studies and proto­types that culminated in the production of the Ro80.

Moving on in 1968 to become adviser to Fiat’s Style Centre, his first fully realised project was to be the Fiat 127, the new front-​​wheel drive car that was one of a handful of revolu­tionary ‘people’s cars’ that arose during the period.

The tragedy is that Manzu never saw the project completed. In a horrible irony, he died in his Fiat 500 on his way to the official present­ation of the final prototype 127.

Lost to time and circum­stance, who knows what wonders Manzu would have brought to our streets…

Lancia: The Death of a Marque?

Wednesday, February 16th, 2011

Car companies die. Like the great lost cities and civil­iz­a­tions of antiquity, what once seemed vast, vibrant and permanent can soon end up as ruins. While I don’t mean to compare Lancia to ancient Rome, I think they’re going the same way.

Why does it happen? Usually because the brand loses its mojo; the cars aren’t as exciting as they once were, quality slips, investment drops. We buy fewer of them, the investment falls further, and soon a famous badge is in a fast, fatal, vicious cycle.

It’s not unusual. The recent recession did for Hummer, Pontiac and Saturn, and very nearly killed Saab and Chrysler, among others. The list of famous British marques that went to the wall is too long to recount. Disappointed enthu­siasts blame everyone from the management (often with justi­fic­ation) to the press (are we supposed to advise you to buy a bad car?). But the car-​​buying public is the guiltiest. We’re fickle. If something better comes along, we’ll buy it. And if we don’t buy the marque we love, its parent company can’t keep making it.

But sometimes, a car company needs to be allowed to die. Lancia is owned by Fiat. Fiat was on its death-​​bed until the Canadian-​​Italian business guru Sergio Marchionne took over. Now it makes a healthy profit. But Marchionne thinks that a car group needs to make six million cars a year to get decent economies of scale, and have a future. Fiat makes just over two million. So when the US giant Chrysler went into bankruptcy protection in 2009, Marchionne took a stake in it. It didn’t cost him anything; he just provided the small car and small engine tech that Fiat does so well and Chrysler needs so desper­ately to satisfy US buyers with a newfound interest in fuel economy.

Marchionne makes no secret of the fact that he’d like to merge Fiat and Chrysler, but he’s already working hard to ration­alize the weirdly diverse range of cars he’s wound up with. Some of the cars on the edges of his new empire are so distinctive that they won’t be compromised; small Fiats, Jeeps, the big Dodge pick-​​up trucks.

But Lancia, stuck in the middle, its sales slow and its distinct­iveness long lost, is suffering. There will be a new Ypsilon supermini, but the other three cars in the range will all be rebadged Chryslers, built in the US or Canada. One will be the Mondeo-​​sized Chrysler 200C, recently intro­duced but based on the old Chrysler Sebring and Dodge Avenger, the very defin­ition of dull-​​driving automotive white goods, and the kind of unima­gin­ative fodder that got the US car industry into such strife in the first place.

Next up is a Lancia-​​badged version of the new Chrysler 300C. This was a great car when it first went on sale in 2004; it probably saved Chrysler. But even then it borrowed some of its under­pin­nings from a 1996 Mercedes, and it’s unclear just how new the ‘all-​​new’ 300 Chrysler showed at this year’s Detroit motor show actually is. It’s certainly a lot more insipid-​​looking than the original.

And lastly, there will be a Lancia version of the Voyager people carrier, which is quite good as people carriers go. But what do any of these cars have to do with Italy, or Lancia’s storied past? Nothing, other than the badge stuck on the nose. Nobody who loves Lancia will buy them. You might suffer one as a rental car at Turin airport, or buy one if you just don’t care about cars and a dealer makes it so cheap you can’t refuse; even in 2008, desperate dealers were offering a buy one, get one free deal on the Dodge on which the mid-​​size Lancia will be based.

Nobody is fooled by cheap, cynical rebadging. This kind of farce has produced some of the worst cars in history. Like the ‘Saabaru’, officially the Saab 9-​​2X, a weird-​​looking mash-​​up of a Subaru Impreza with a Saab nose that US buyers didn’t suffer for long. Or the Alfa Arna of the mid-​​eighties, a car that famously attempted to marry Italian passion to Japanese reliab­ility, but got it the wrong way round to the lasting shame of all concerned.

I’d actually rather see Lancia put into suspended animation than suffer this. It could always be resur­rected when Marchionne’s plans for world domin­ation have worked out and he has the cash to develop a real Lancia. At least we won’t have to look at them on UK roads, where Chryslers will stay Chryslers. But elsewhere, I worry the damage to Lancia’s image will be terminal, and ruins will be all that remain.

New Fiat 500 Campaign

Thursday, January 20th, 2011

Spanish agency Leo Burnett Iberia have come up with an inter­esting, colourful print campaign designed to hammer home the message that consumers can design their own cinquecento.

Brazilian Illustrator and Art Director Bruno Nakano has created a series of spreads with pictorial associ­ations that each go back to the charac­terful image of Fiat’s prodigal child.

The strapline is clever too:

Fiat 500: Add something, change everything. Customize yours at Fiat.es

1969: Crisis? What Crisis?

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

1969 was a critical moment in the history of the American and British car indus­tries: it was the beginning of the end. Both were about to endure a pretty horrible 1970s; within a few years there would be virtually nothing left of the home-​​owned British car industry, and while the US carmakers would survive and sporad­ically prosper in the future, they would never be as dominant and confident as they were in ’69.

I don’t mean to trivi­alize the Vietnam War but it’s tempting to compare what was happening there with what was happening in the car world. In both cases, an over-​​fed, over-​​manned, over-​​confident West faced a modest, adaptable, nimble, clever Asian foe able to get by on a bowl of rice each day. Just as the North would win in Vietnam, the Japanese would take advantage of the coming reces­sions and oil crises to rout the complacent American and British carmakers in their home markets and the new ones that were springing up around the world.

But like all empires, they went out with a party. In America, 1969 was all about the muscle car. Just a year later, the Clean Air Act would kill them stone-​​dead. But in ’69, you could still buy a Plymouth Barracuda or Superbird, or a Chevelle SS454 or an AMC Rebel ‘The Machine’, all intro­duced in ’69 for the 1970 model year.

You love muscle cars. You might not think you do, but you just haven’t yet stared slack-​​jawed at the vast wing on the back of a Superbird, or into the ultra-​​clean, chrome and body-​​colour engine bay of a custom. You haven’t seen their candy-​​coloured paintjobs looking perfect in Californian sunshine. You haven’t smelt the sickly-​​sweet unburnt petrol, old vinyl and car wax, or heard the lazy whump-​​whump-​​whump of a seven-​​litre V8 that can’t be bothered to make more than 400 horsepower. These things are the inbred, mutated spawn of an utterly isola­tionist car culture that just didn’t care what the Europeans or Japanese were doing. But their self-​​confidence makes them instantly, impuls­ively covetable.

And in possibly the single coolest act in the history of the car industry, Chrysler somehow got over the rule-​​by-​​committee that usually cripples creativity in a big corpor­ation and offered those muscle cars in colours called Sub-​​Lime, Go Mango, Panther Pink and Plum Crazy. The guys at Ford thought this was a great idea, so they loosened their Mad-​​Men-​​style tightly-​​knotted skinny ties, lit a massive doobie and came up with some colour names that were even better. Bring ‘Em Back Olive was probably a thinly-​​veiled reference to Vietnam, Anti-​​Establish Mint described the political mood, Original Cinnamon reflected what everyone was up to and Freudian Gilt probably over-​​estimated the intel­li­gence of the average muscle car buyer. Hulla Blue, History Onyx and Good Clean Fawn were just funny.

Of course, if you really were part of the counter-​​culture you probably didn’t care much about cars, unless you were into the nascent envir­on­mental movement and had a vague idea that a 7-​​litre V8 wasn’t good for, like, the air, or something, or had no other way to get to Woodstock or Altamont. Probably couldn’t afford them either, unless you were a Beatle.

By 1969 John Lennon had finished work on the Rolls-​​Royce Phantom V – also used as transport by the Queen – which he’d bought three years earlier. He added a double bed, a thumping sound-​​system with loudhailer, and finally a gyspy-​​caravan-​​meets-​​mescaline paintjob by Dutch art collective The Fool. A year later, the Beatles would split and John and Yoko would ship the Rolls to New York, but in 1969 it was still a regular sight on London streets.

But the Beatles’ other car choices reflected the classness of the time. Brian Epstein had bought them each a Mini Cooper S. George Harrison painted his with mystical Indian scenes, and he, John, Cynthia and Patti Boyd are reported to have folded themselves into its tiny cabin to take their first acid trip.

The Italians weren’t much concerned with the counter-​​culture, and were just taking advantage of the relative economic prosperity to produce some of their most seductive supercars and GTs. Ferrari and Lamborghini were in full flow – the Miura was unques­tionably the star – and they were briefly joined by super-​​exotic marques like Iso and the Swiss-​​based Monteverdi. ’69 driving Italian-​​style is perfectly encap­su­lated in the opening scenes of The Italian Job, released that year, in which Beckermann in his big shades and driving gloves pilots an orange Miura over the St. Bernard Pass, managing somehow to light a (conven­tional) cigarette as he tackles the Alpine hairpins. The reality of ’69 Italian motoring was rather different: an unreliable Fiat 124, with premature rust.

The Italian Job made heroes of its British star cars; not just the Minis, but the E-​​Types, a Land Rover, an Aston-​​Martin DB4 and a Bedford coach too. It ought to have launched a colossal export drive; plainly, the British car industry could do sexy, fast, clever, tough and affordable too. But another film – this year’s Made in Dagenham, set a year earlier in 1968 – shows why it didn’t happen. The film captures the atmosphere of a sixties car plant perfectly; all brown overcoats, roll-​​ups, tea breaks and sexism. The boxy MkII Cortina gets a starring role. It tells the story of the walkout by 150 women employed by Ford to stitch Cortina seats when they were reclas­sified as unskilled labour and denied the better pay of the men – often their husbands – who assembled the cars’ oily bits with varying degrees of success at the main plant across the road.

The Ford strike of 1968 was different to the walk-​​outs led by the infamous Red Robbo at Longbridge in the ‘70s. It wasn’t directed specifically at the misman­agement of the car industry but was inspired by the general principle of equal pay, and led, admirably, to the Equal Pay Act of 1970. But it marked the start of a decade of indus­trial action that, together with that misman­agement, some terrible products and terri­fying new compet­ition from Japan and Germany, effect­ively killed the British-​​owned car industry. As the Dagenham women walked out, Britain was making more cars than ever; peak production actually came in 1972 with a slightly freakish 1.9 million. Less than a decade later that figure had halved.

But in 1969, nobody really knew what was coming. Cars reflect their times. The times were good.