Archives

Japanissimo!

japan_1

Japan’s final victory in its long campaign to dominate the global car industry only came last year. General Motors had been the world’s biggest carmaker for 75 years, and last year celebrated its centenary. Toyota’s birthday gift to the General was to steal his long-held, long-cherished number-one slot. Japan overtook Germany as the world’s biggest car exporter back in ’74, and the US as the world’s biggest carmaker in 1980, but it took until 2008 for a Japanese carmaker to become the biggest in the world.

And when it finally came, it was a very Japanese victory. There was no corporate crowing. Toyota’s bosses wouldn’t discuss it; not even a press release was issued. Maybe they’d foreseen the cataclysmic sales slump that has since hit every major carmaker, Toyota included, and decided that making a big noise about numbers would be a bad idea.

But the slump won’t threaten Toyota’s number one position. And what do you notice about those two other red-letter dates in Japan’s automotive history? Each follows a major global economic crisis, namely the oil panics of ’73 and ’79. In each case Japan’s car industry was hit hard. But in each case, as the world’s economy rebounded, chastened car buyers wanted more of the small, reliable, economical and affordable cars the Japanese build so brilliantly. You can count on the same thing happening again.

Honda, First International Automaker To Build A Car In America

So where did it all go right for Japan? As a global car superpower, it was a very late starter. In the 1920s and ‘30s, as the US and European carmakers were bringing motoring to the masses and building fabulous Bugattis and Duesenbergs, the Japanese government classed anything with four wheels and an engine as a munition, and controlled what was built. So the first Japanese car firms – Mitsubishi, Isuzu, Mazda and Toyota – mostly built grim military trucks.

But the government also passed an act which made it almost impossible for foreign carmakers to continue to operate in Japan. Ford and GM established themselves in Europe before the war and still dominate. They also controlled virtually all of Japan’s car production until the mid-‘30s, and might still do if they hadn’t been booted out.

The Americans might have lost another opportunity to stifle Japan’s nascent car industry during the war, when a massive bombing mission on Toyota’s main factory was called off after the A-bombs were dropped and Japan capitulated. Not that Toyota and its rivals then had it easy; in the bleak post-war years they were reduced to making pots and pans to keep their factories open.

But the Americans helped out again, twice. First, while still controlling Japan they banned car production. So the Japanese concentrated on building cheap, efficient motorbikes, which found an instant, vast and desperate global market. By 1960, Japan was the biggest bike maker in the world, and firms like Honda and Suzuki got their start. Then the Korean War brought US money flowing into Japan, creating demand for military trucks, reopening the car factories and supercharging the Japanese economy.

japan_3

But the real inflection point came in 1955. The Japanese government again stepped in, but this time with a positive suggestion. It proposed a ‘people’s car’; something small, light and cheap that cash-strapped post-war car buyers could reasonably aspire to, with tax breaks to encourage firms to build them and buyers to buy them. It was the birth of the ‘kei-car’: the tiny, distinctive city transport still popular in Japan today. But more importantly it brilliantly foresaw the kind of car the world would want in two decades’ time, and it wasn’t the gross-out, gas-guzzling, wings’n’fins monstrosities that Detroit was producing.

Japan’s small-car expertise is the single most important reason for its success. But the Japanese also pushed hard to export them or – better – make them overseas, and built them with an efficiency and quality never seen before. Taiichi Ohno rose from the factory floor to create the fabled Toyota Production System; an obsessive-compulsive’s guide to carmaking now studied in business schools around the world, complete with its own language and the reason Toyotas have won die-hard loyalty for their utter dependability. “If you want to go into the Outback, take a Land Rover,” runs an old Australian saying. “But if you want to come back, take a Land Cruiser.”

Japan’s reputation as a purveyor of passionless white-good-on-wheels is undeserved. True, their engineers’ passion is directed more towards faultless build quality than naked dynamism, but that’s hardly a bad thing. But this is also a car industry that got into Formula One and world rallying in the ‘60s, as soon as it could afford to. Honda’s first car was a sports car, and Nissan-Datsun’s 240Z one of the seminal sports cars of the ‘60s and ‘70s.

japan_4

But it wasn’t until 1989 that the Japanese really started to cut loose, launching the Mazda MX-5, which would become the world’s best-selling sports car, and the Lexus brand, which showed the Japanese could do luxury as well as – or better than – the Europeans. In 1990 came the incomparable Honda NSX, which married Ferrari looks and responses to Corolla reliability and running costs. And from ’92, Subaru and Mitsubishi put increasingly absurd amounts of power into the road-going saloon versions of their world rally cars.

All of these cars, and others, have fanatical followings at home and abroad, but it’s still hard to get excited about any aspect of a Toyota Avensis. Our feelings about Japanese cars run from utter indifference to total obsession. That won’t change. Right now, the Japanese car makers are hard at work on the plug-in hybrid, fuel-cell and battery-electric cars we’ll all be desperate for in a decade. Like those first kei-cars half a century ago, they won’t be exciting, but they’ll be ready when the world needs them.

And at the other end of the scale, there’s the new Nissan GT-R. It exceeds even icons like the NSX with its towering, staggering performance and intellect. But it differs from most of the stand-out Japanese cars of the past in being distinctively, self-confidently Japanese; its styling inspired by the giant Gundam robots of manga rather than the work of the famous European car design houses. Consider it a gift from the Japanese car industry to itself. And expect more of the same.

By Ben Oliver

If you need Japanese import insurance then try Adrian Flux, call 0800 089 0050.

Cranky Genius: 2009 Yamaha R1

Japanese invention of the year: Yamaha’s cross-plane crankshaft
Bang 270º bang 180º bang 90º bang 180º

yamaha_r_1-500x3751

If Japan has been known for one thing when it comes to cars and motorbikes, it is innovation. This year, Yamaha’s cross-plane crank engine, which appears in their R1 Superbike is sure to make some (asymmetrical) waves.

It’s going to be a good year for Japanese inventiveness. We’ve got Showa’s Big Piston Fork (fitted to the Suzuki GSX-R1000K9 and Kawasaki ZX-6R); Honda’s electronic braking for the CBR6 and Blade; and Yamaha’s ‘just like Rossi’ cross-plane crank. If you want useful, the Honda brakes are the easy winner. Trouble is, they’re so clever you don’t know they’re working. Same goes for the new Showa forks, unless you’re braking hard into a bend.

But you can’t ignore the R1’s new crank. It looks different, it feels different, and boy does it sound different. Although Yamaha patented a cross-plane crank in the 1960s, this one dates back to 2003. They’d just tempted Valentino Rossi away from Honda, and they needed something special to turn their dog of an M1 into a MotoGP winner. Of four experimental ‘growler’ engines at the Sepang winter test, one stood out.

At the time most commentators called it the ‘Big Bang’ engine. We now know that a better description might be ‘Big Grip’. That’s what Yamaha are claiming, at any rate.

So what’s so great about uneven firing pulses? They are certainly nothing new. For more than 100 years singles, V-twins and some parallel twins and triples have delivered uneven pulses to the rear wheel, while fours have stayed regular. But the last 20 years have seen a growing consensus (first in 500s, now in MotoGP) that uneven firing intervals are superior.

The traditional explanation is that an engine with an irregular beat gives the rear tyre more time to recover between pulses, so the rider can use more throttle before it spins up. But if you cluster all the pulses together, who’s to say they won’t make the tyre let go more easily? With the new R1, Yamaha offer a more credible reason. They say their system creates a more direct feel for the rider between throttle and rear tyre. And it does that by stripping out the undesirable ‘momentum effect’ of a traditional four-cylinder crankshaft.

To get your head around this idea, think about what an engine actually deals out to the rear wheel. Firstly, it transmits the combustion force. Open the throttle, the engine gulps more fuel and air, the burn does its thing, and you get a bigger ‘whomp’ acting on the tops of the pistons. Simple and controllable. But there’s also a secondary effect. As a conventional four-cylinder crankshaft rotates, it creates a stop-start signature. All four pistons (and their crank web balancing weights) reach their highest and lowest speeds at the same time. Yamaha call this ‘inertial torque’, and describe it rising and falling in a sine wave.

This fluttering, say Yamaha, gets in the way of you feeling what’s going on. And there’s nothing you can do about it. Enter the crossplane crankshaft. Viewed from one end, there’s a crankpin every 90 degrees (north, south, east and west). So as the crank spins there are always two pistons going flat out when the other two are stopped. The inherent architecture of Ducatis creates the same effect.

Is it really any use? In MotoGP, it’s contributed to three world titles in five years. On the road, the advantage isn’t so clear, unless you yearn to own a straight four that sounds like a Vee. The 2009 R1 is a peaky beast, and low-speed running is – well, lumpy. The Suzuki and Honda rivals are tough competition, too. We’ll have to wait for hot summer tarmac to know for sure.

flat_crank

Doh. What is a crankshaft again? A crankshaft is just a device that turns up-and-down motion into round-and-round – for example, the pedals on a bicycle. Naturally, the pedals are spaced opposite each other, so that one of your legs is pushing when the other one can’t. Most four-cylinder engines use the same principle: the pistons (the things that transmit the ‘shove’ derived from burning fuel and air in a confined space) rise and fall in pairs. Because an individual cylinder only fires once every two revolutions, the crankshaft as a whole receives a one-cylinder pulse of power once every half revolution, or 180 degrees. Yamaha’s new crossplane crankshaft is different. There’s no direct comparison with a bicycle because the bike has four pistons, and you’ve only got two legs. But imagine the angle between your pedal cranks being something like 100 degrees, rather than 180. It would feel horrible. But the R1 revs 200 times faster than your legs, so it’s not bothered.

Turning Japanese

Cars from the Land of the Rising Sun of every era inspire devotion in a diaspora of automotive enthusiasts. Influx sought out a fistful of them.

jon_rodwell_1

“I look after between 38 and 50 Japanese cars
in various stages of repair. I can’t put my finger
on what it is about them that appeals to me. It’s
just something about their simplicity.”

Jon Rodwell: engineer and Japanese car
obsessive.

bob_1

“Ist generation Celicas were so advanced for their day. There’s
something about them that reminds me of American muscle cars
– but they're much more efficient. These two are pretty perfect. If
its worth doing something, it’s worth doing well.”

Bob Clark: Toyota Celica 1 GT x 2

james

“I like the NSX because there’s no ego to
them. I thought about trading it in for a GT 911
but this is something much more unique.
It really is a utilitarian supercar.”

James Taylor: Honda NSX

kieran_bowler_1

“The Cube is so controversial. I get everything from amazing
love to absolute hatred from people. The cars just don’t fit into any
category that people here understand. That messes with their minds or something.”

Kieran Bowler: Nissan Cube ‘Rider’ Edition.


xr_landscape

“My dad wants this because he loves Japanese cars. He just
thinks they’re cool and you can’t buy this one here in England.”

Gabriel Coltrane Fordham: Honda Crossroads.

Photography by Robert Drake

Skyline: The Evolution of a Japanese Legend

Our Favourite Skylines

nissangtr_v_3_small1

We love the Skyline. You love the Skyline. Let’s face it, everybody loves a Skyline. But the model had evolved hugely from its first conception at the end of the fifties to the current supreme example of passionate Japanese engineering and design. The GT-R Spec V is targeted specifically at enthusiast drivers who desire race car-level performance in a street-legal vehicle.

Developed around the multi-dimensional Nissan GT-R sports car, which was introduced just more than one year ago to universal global acclaim, the new SpecV model builds on the original’s “ultimate supercar that anyone can enjoy driving anywhere, at anytime” philosophy – taking it to an entirely new level of “oneness between man and machine.” The SpecV model includes unique body, interior and performance equipment and modifications, raising the GT-R’s unmatched performance to even higher levels.

The GT-R SpecV’s new exterior features include a carbon fibre rear spoiler, a carbon fibre grille, and carbon fibre brake ducts. The SpecV is available exclusively in Ultimate Black Opal (RP) body colour. Inside, the SpecV’s unique two-seat interior (non-SpecV GT-R models also include a two-place rear seat) offers special Recaro carbon fibre bucket seats, while carbon fibre insets embellish the rear centre storage box, instrument panel and other trim areas.

Performance is enhanced with a new high gear boost control device, which momentarily increases boost of the engine’s twin turbochargers for greater torque in the intermediate-to-high speed ranges to provide a more powerful feeling of acceleration, while also allowing the engine to operate at a lower speed for improved fuel economy. Other modifications include a titanium-coated exhaust system and carbon-ceramic brakes that provide powerful stopping performance.

The GT-R SpecV is also equipped with lightweight, racing-style forged aluminium wheels that were developed for this model and have been sold by Nissan Motorsports International (NISMO) since September 2008. The lighter unsprung weight provided by the new wheels, together with the enhanced braking capability, an exclusive suspension and high-grip tyres, combine to deliver the SpecV’s exceptional performance.

Here are ten of our high-points of the evolution to the superlative GT-R V-Spec launched earlier this year.

[autoviewer id="36" width="500" height="375"]

Adrin Flux have great deals on Skyline insurance, click on the link or call 0800 089 0050.

Name and Shame

Giving a Japanese product a western name is sometimes thought to add cachet; the danger is you end up with a random selection of Janglish words that only add ridicule to an otherwise blameless model. Here are some of our favourites, none of which officially made it out of Japan with these names attached.

[autoviewer id="46" width="500" height="375"]

by Ben Oliver

Access: Denied

Despite their keenness to export, some of Japan’s best cars never made it to Europe – at least, not officially. Some pre-date the export drive, some were only built in tiny numbers and others they just didn’t think we’d like. It’s a pity; some of these cars are technological marvels, and they all directly refute Japan’s reputation for building boring cars.

[autoviewer id="45" width="500" height="375"]

by Ben Oliver